What a measure is

measuresigma-algebraprobability-measuredensityradon-nikodympushforward

In one paragraph

A measure is a rule that gives a size to sets of a space: length, area, mass, or probability. It takes a set A and returns a number \mu(A)\ge 0, and it obeys one sanity rule: if you glue together pieces that do not overlap, their sizes add. A probability measure is the case where the whole space has size 1, and P(A) is the chance of the event A.

The picture

A bell-shaped density curve over a line. A vertical segment at one point shows the density value p(x). Two separate intervals A and B are shaded under the curve, each labelled with its area as the measure.
A function eats a point and returns a value, here the height p(x). A measure eats a set and returns a size, here the area under the curve over that set. The two shaded pieces do not overlap, so the size of “A or B” is the sum of their areas.

The definition, piece by piece

A measure \mu is defined on a space X together with a collection \mathcal A of subsets, the measurable sets. It must satisfy:

  1. Nothing has no size: \mu(\varnothing)=0.
  2. Additivity: for non-overlapping A_1,A_2,\dots in \mathcal A, \mu\big(\bigcup_i A_i\big)=\sum_i \mu(A_i).

Why only some sets? On the real line one cannot give every subset a consistent length. So you keep a well-behaved collection \mathcal A, called a \sigma-algebra: it contains X, and it is closed under complements and countable unions. Together, (X,\mathcal A,\mu) is a measure space. In practice you rarely meet a non-measurable set.

Common examples

Measure versus function

A measure is technically a function, but its input is a set, not a point. This is why a probability density p(x) is not itself a probability: it can exceed 1. It is a rate, turned into a size by adding it up over a set,

\mu(A)=\int_A p(x)\,dx .

So a function p can build a measure \mu, and p is then called the density of \mu. Some measures have no density at all: the Dirac measure cannot be written as an ordinary function. This is the reason measures are the more general tool. Going the other way, a measure is what you integrate against: \int f\,d\mu weights the values of f by how much \mu puts on each region, and the expectation E[f] is this for a probability measure.

“Positive” measure

A positive measure has \mu(A)\ge 0 for every A. This is just the ordinary case, named so to set it apart from signed measures (which can be negative) and complex measures. A signed measure splits into a difference of two positive ones, \mu=\mu^+-\mu^-, which is why positive measures are the basic building block.

Why it matters for information geometry

\sigma-algebra, measurable function, Lebesgue integral, absolute continuity, Radon–Nikodym derivative, pushforward measure, product measure.